Re: AIX shared libraries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: AIX shared libraries
Date
Msg-id 60slivoduw.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AIX shared libraries (was Re: [PATCHES] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries)  ("Rocco Altier" <RoccoA@Routescape.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
RoccoA@Routescape.com ("Rocco Altier") writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Is it
>> > possible that the rules have changed across AIX versions, 
>> > and that the code in there now is needful for older versions?
>> 
>> I don't think that this behaviour has changed. I remember it from
>> AIX 4.3.2.
>> 
> AIX 4.3 is the first version to support the -brtl.  The current code is
> in place to mimic the behaviour of dlopen, etc, on the older platforms.
>
> I think we are at a point that we can stop maintaining AIX older than
> 4.3 if we want.

Version 5.1 is no longer being maintained by IBM; we were some
displeased when we heard when support offerings were expiring :-(.
Fortunately, we already had plans in place for a migration to 5.3.

I have to agree that even 4.3 is "really rather old" now.

Looking at IBM's "support lifecycle" list...
<http://www-306.ibm.com/software/info/supportlifecycle/list/a.html>

AIX version   Available    Support Withdrawn
----------------------------------------------------------------- 5.1         May 2001      April 2006 5.2         Oct
2002     Sept 2008 5.3         Aug 2004      unannounced, presumably late 2010...
 

I'd guess that 4.3 fell out of support in late 2004.
-- 
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxdatabases.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://linuxfinances.info/info/
"Of course 5  years from now that will be different,  but 5 years from
now  everyone  will  be  running  free  GNU on  their  200  MIPS,  64M
SPARCstation-5."  -- Andrew Tanenbaum, 1992.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS commit messages and backpatching
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: - Proposal for repreparing prepared statements