Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date
Msg-id 60slbel0of.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  ("Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
ler@lerctr.org ("Larry Rosenman") writes:
> I might use that as the base then, since the hardware finishes getting here
> tomorrow.
>
> My question still stands on what OS's we need coverage for.

I've got Debian testing/unstable covered.  I'm not sure we have
Novell/SuSE covered...
-- 
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "linuxdatabases.info")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/emacs.html
"Motto for a research laboratory: What we work on today, others will
first think of tomorrow." -- Alan J. Perlis


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index thoughts (another segfault)
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pgbench transaction timestamps