Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
Date
Msg-id 607F2CE4.80107@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/20/21 15:24, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> data structures that work well don't need anybody to make a case for them.
> They simply work well for the task they were designed for.

How would showing that to be true for data structure X be different from
making a case for data structure X?

Regards,
-Chap



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
Next
From: Daniel Carter
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add GSSAPI ccache_name option to libpq