Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date
Msg-id 6067.1210169177@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * It does not come close to passing the regression tests.  I saw a lot of
>> ! ERROR:  unrecognized node type: 903
>> which suggests that something's been screwed up about parse analysis
>> (903 = T_A_Const, which shouldn't get further than parse analysis),

> Could you tell me what queries hit these errors?

I remember seeing it on some EXECUTEs, but you really ought to run the
tests for yourself.  A *minimum* requirement on any submitted patch
is that it should pass the regression tests.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Posting to hackers and patches lists