Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071003111853m6c51c7tcdf6c4038285047d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribi=F3:
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> > What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level targe=
t,
>> > ie "make docs", "make install-docs". =A0I don't much care for Lou's
>> > suggestion of tying it to a configure option because that imposes the
>> > significant additional cost of re-configuring when I change my mind.
>> > I do need to be *able* to build the docs, I just don't want it happeni=
ng
>> > by surprise.
>>
>> Agreed. =A0I think that is a much better solution.
>
> +1, and I think docs should be a dependency of world, too.

Definitely.

...Robert

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Next
From: "Gray Watson"
Date:
Subject: BUG #5372: insert into fails with integer expression type char error