Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date
Msg-id 20100312015014.GF3512@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> > What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level target,
> > ie "make docs", "make install-docs".  I don't much care for Lou's
> > suggestion of tying it to a configure option because that imposes the
> > significant additional cost of re-configuring when I change my mind.
> > I do need to be *able* to build the docs, I just don't want it happening
> > by surprise.
>
> Agreed.  I think that is a much better solution.

+1, and I think docs should be a dependency of world, too.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: log : bad file dscriptor????
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?