Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071002031827n4001ace5j63211623c41949d9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> I'll repeat my tests with current CVS HEAD.
>>
>> OK... can you post the exact queries that you are used for the
>> previous round of testing?
>
> Robert, Mark posted all queries in his post ! See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php

Maybe we are now getting to the heart of the confusion.  Mark wrote in
his email: "Unfortunately I was not really able to reproduce the RND
(teodor's) dataset, nor the random array test as the SQL used to test
the implementation was not present on the page above."  The SQL for
the fixed-length tests is posted, but the SQL for the variable length
test is not - so Mark was just guessing on that one.

Or am I just totally confused?

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL