Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071001291559y13105cf1lf12557838b4075aa@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Well, since I asked in April of 2009, at the beginning of the cycle, 6
>> years after the introduction of the variable, and we still are not doing
>> it, then let's stop pretending we will ever do it.
>
> We have made forward progress since that thread (we fixed the plpgsql
> parsing issues, partially in 8.4 and completely for 9.0).

This is a really good argument.  If there are changes in 9.0 that are
designed to mitigate the impact of this change, then we should wait at
least one or two more releases before doing anything.

I say, let's plan it for 10.0.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown