On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Updated patch attached. I still think this is a bizarre API.
>
> Well, if we had it to do over I'm sure we'd have done it differently,
> but the functions are there now and we aren't going to change them ...
I agree, but I don't feel the need to repeat the mistakes we've
already made by slavishly copying them into new places. I think as
long as we're adding a new function, we should make it behave sanely.
We could even take the opportunity to go back and add a saner version
of PQescapeStringConn.
...Robert
