On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> > If this is the case, then I think we could just decide that their name
>> > is reloptions due to hysterical reasons and be done with it.
>>
>> Yeah. It's particularly unfortunate that we call them "reloptions" in
>> the code but "storage parameters" in the documentation. Neither is a
>> particularly good name, and having two different ones is extra-poor.
>> But I'm fine with leaving the names as they are and moving on, if no
>> one objects too much. Speak now or don't complain about it after I
>> write the patch!
>
> Maybe after we move to Git we can rename them in the code?
I'm OK with renaming it before I start working on the main patch, or
after it's committed, or never. I just don't want to have to rebase
it in the middle.
...Robert
