On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I thing, so change of original name should generate warning.
>
>> Well, if other people think that's necessary, it's certainly possible.
>
> I think Pavel's entire line of argument is utter nonsense. He's setting
> up a straw man that has nothing to do with any actually likely use of
> the variable.
+1. I can't even understand why we're still arguing about this.
Other than Pavel, everyone thinks this is a complete non-problem, and
Pavel's hypothesis basically boils down to "someone might use this
feature in a stupid and naive way". Well, sure. They might. So
what?
> I do agree with Peter's concerns about limiting the character set of the
> name string, and maybe there should be some sort of length limit too.
I don't have a strong feeling about this. If limiting this to 7-bit
characters solves some nasty encoding problems or something, then
fine, but otherwise I think we can just escape what we emit into the
log and say that users who log this information should have a
sufficiently sophisticated log parser to cope with it.
...Robert
