Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070909301001g2901a0bey5883131272abc83c@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> ... (and many of the more
>> significant remaining patches look like they are right up Tom's alley
>> anyway).
>
> FWIW, if left to my own devices I will eventually get to everything
> except the dblink, ecpg, and encoding/win32 patches.  I don't intend
> to touch any of those because there are other committers better
> qualified to review them.  (I don't actually think we have anybody
> except Michael who's really familiar with ecpg.)

Thanks, I think that's helpful information.

> However, if no other committers are working on it it's going to be
> a long commitfest ...

That is my concern as well.

> The other problem is that most of the patches are not Ready for
> Committer anyway.

I (and hopefully the people who agreed to help with patch-chasing) can
work on this, but given that there are 5 that are Ready for Committer
and probably as many more that are close, and further given that in
the past 7 days exactly 1 patch from the CommitFest has been
committed, I'm not sure there's a real problem here.  If you
commit/bounce all 5 of those afternoon I will spend the evening making
sure you have a few more to tackle tomorrow.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux LSB init script
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings