Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070909221053q7cabd1c2tb462aabee40eb705@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
> have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with
> pg_largeobject_meta

I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata.  That
seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do,
without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever.  But
I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with
pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE