Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date
Msg-id 3073cc9b0909221059g5d030916sa93a3c218d30607a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
>> have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with
>> pg_largeobject_meta
>
> I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata.  That
> seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do,
> without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever.  But
> I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with
> pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta.
>

ok! metadata is self explanatory meta is not...
at least not for someone that his mother tongue is spanish and think
of "meta" like in "goal" ;)


--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE