Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070908031810vad54b41h4ab76b13c78cfbc7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
List pgsql-hackers
2009/8/3 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>:
> I now plans to submit two patches for the next commit fest.
> The one is implementation of the abstraction layer.
> The other is basic implementation of the SE-PostgreSQL.

Is this a good idea, or would it be better to focus on the aclcheck
stuff (which is what I understand you to mean here by abstraction
layer) first?  You will be much happier getting one patch committed
than two patches not committed...  getting two patches of this size in
one CommitFest seems very unlikely, and I worry that the SE-PostgreSQL
patch will distract your time and reviewing time from the aclcheck
refactoring that must get done first, and well.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump