Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070906011244j56bce67bofdec45e6087c5803@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Let me start this out by voting the things I think we can drop until 8.5:
>
> * gettext plurals patch needs some polishing
> -- revert patch, save for 8.5
>
> #  adjust information_schema precision and scale fields?
> -- save for 8.5
>
> # instrument the Windows shared memory reattachment problem?
> -- as much as I'd like to do this, the solution could be as bad as the
> problem; we'd need more testing time for new instrumentation.  Will have to
> deal with via testing patched versions.
>
> # tweak the ordering heuristics for parallel pg_restore?
> -- beta2 version is "good enough"; further improvements should be saved for
> 8.5.
>
> # change or at least redocument from_collapse_limit?
> -- should be doc patch only.  Robert Haas should write it.
>
> # revisit increase of default_statistics_target?
> -- No.  Still appears to be artifact of DBT2.  Can't reproduce the issue
> using pgbench, or any other test.  Still investigating.
>
>
> Other questions:
>
> #  cost_nestloop and cost_hashjoin are broken for SEMI and ANTI joins
>
>    * tgl says: I think this is mostly dealt with but it could use
> performance testing.
>
> Mark?  Jignesh?   Can you test this?

+1 to all of these.  Will send extremely short doc patch tonight.  I
recommend we create
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items and start
bumping things that can't be completed for 8.4.

Basically, my opinion is that if it's not a regression, it's too late
to work on it now.  We should ship the release when we're confident
that the new features have had adequate testing and we've squashed all
the regressions.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path improvements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?