Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070903270927n31f4db4bn4bf416ac89997f08@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Friday 27 March 2009 14:46:32 Greg Stark wrote:
>> Regarding using the hostname of the system... There's no such thing.
>> Interfaces have names, hosts can have multiple interfaces so the can
>> have multiple names...
>
> But there is `hostname` and `hostname --fqdn`, both of which are well-defined
> independent of a connection.

But they aren't guaranteed to return anything useful, and IME often don't.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?