At 07:47 PM 11/23/2004, terry@ashtonwoodshomes.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Jim Seymour
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:18 PM
> > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upcoming Changes to News Server ...
> >
> >
> >
> > "Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > It's ok. Mysql's better anyway.
> >
> > Was that absolutely necessary?
>
>Was what necessary? (The cheap shot or the fact that he is ill informed? :)
>
>For the record, I have both mysql and postgresql installations, and
>postgresql, even without pgadmin
>iii, is far superior in MANY ways to mysql.
Many, maybe. Not all and certainly not more. Of course, ihat's my OPINION
and I am quite well informed about databases, thankyouverymuch.
I'm also well informed about running an NSP and what kind of mess Marc is
now making and that's still the subject of the thread.
