Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
Date
Msg-id 5e124b1d-bd8f-0659-1088-4952464223bc@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-11-04 15:53, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> No, I'm not proposing a full revert.  But there's certainly room to
>> consider reverting the part that says you*must*  write "-f -" to get
>> output to stdout.
> I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated
> promptly.

Users with with hundreds or thousands of servers and various ancient 
maintenance scripts lying around in hard-to-track ways are not going be 
able to get everything upgraded to the latest minors *and* new script 
versions any time soon.  Until they do, they are effectively blocked 
from introducing PG12 into their environment.  This is very complicated 
and risky for them.  I think we should revert the part that requires 
using -f - at least for PG12.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)