Re: Installation of Postgres 32Bit on 64 bit machine - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Douglas McNaught
Subject Re: Installation of Postgres 32Bit on 64 bit machine
Date
Msg-id 5ded07e00805191457q19166825x96c060fe62ca6b03@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Installation of Postgres 32Bit on 64 bit machine  (cinu <cheriyamoozhiyilcinu@yahoo.co.in>)
Responses Re: Installation of Postgres 32Bit on 64 bit machine  (cinu <cheriyamoozhiyilcinu@yahoo.co.in>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:40 PM, cinu <cheriyamoozhiyilcinu@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am trying to install PostgreSQL(postgresql-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686.rpm) on a 64
> bit machine, when I try to install I get the following error message:
>
>
>
> :/home/dump/postgres32bit # rpm -ivh postgresql-server-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686.rpm
> postgresql-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686.rpm postgresql-libs-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686.rpm
> warning: postgresql-server-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 20579f11
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         libcrypto.so.4 is needed by postgresql-server-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         libreadline.so.4 is needed by postgresql-server-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         libssl.so.4 is needed by postgresql-server-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         initscripts is needed by postgresql-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         libcrypto.so.4 is needed by postgresql-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         libreadline.so.4 is needed by postgresql-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         libssl.so.4 is needed by postgresql-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>         libcrypto.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>
>         libssl.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.2.4-1PGDG.i686
>
>
>
> This installation is being done on SUSE linux 10, please let me know if
> there is any alternative with which I can bypass these errors and make the
> installation successful.

You need to install 32-bit versions of the libraries PG depends on.
They can coexist alongside the 64-bit versions.

-Doug


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: cinu
Date:
Subject: Installation of Postgres 32Bit on 64 bit machine
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Link requirements creep