Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date
Msg-id 5ca841a1-1506-fda0-6428-08e31c38c3f2@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-www
On 3/13/18 13:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
>> Running gcov on the box itself in the source dir shows the same results
>> which you got:
> 
> Oh really!
> 
>> Which seems to indicate that this actually is some kind of lcov bug.
> 
> Yeah.  I'd written that off as too low-probability to worry about,
> but maybe not.  I'll poke further.  Peter, which lcov did you test?

lcov: LCOV version 1.13

The one that comes with Debian stable, presumably the same that is
running on coverage.p.o.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Main page of wiki.postgresql.org
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org