Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date
Msg-id 26015.1520963110@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
List pgsql-www
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> Running gcov on the box itself in the source dir shows the same results
> which you got:

Oh really!

> Which seems to indicate that this actually is some kind of lcov bug.

Yeah.  I'd written that off as too low-probability to worry about,
but maybe not.  I'll poke further.  Peter, which lcov did you test?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org