While the sentiment about supporting pgsql friendly vendors is valid,
personally, I'd sooner use dbase 3 than give SCO any money.
Gavin
On 03 Jun 2004 14:51:16 -0400, Robert Treat
<xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 06:42, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 June 2004 15:24, Mike Mascari wrote:
> > > "Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE:HPQ - news) will support open-source
> > > software companies JBoss and MySQL on its servers as it seeks to
> > > compete with International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM - news)
> > > in offering Linux (news - web sites)-compatible services, a Linux
> > > executive said late Monday."
> > >
> > > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=569&ncid=738&e=1&u=/nm/2004
> > >0601/tc_nm/tech_hewlettpackard_dc
> > >
> > > Perhaps an advocacy member should persuade them otherwise...
> >
> > Also see (Unwrap URL of course)
> >
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=109481&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&tid=173&mode=flat&pid=9298111
> >
> > Trusting his identity, I would say we need to persuade somebody else than HP.
> > If you have HP serving you, you can press your company. Also one of
> > postgresql supporting companies stepping up would be good as well..
> >
> > Shridhar
> >
>
> Maybe people should start using SCO, given that they tend to be pretty
> postgresql friendly.
>
> :-)
>
> Robert Treat
> --
> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
