Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laura Smith
Subject Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
Date
Msg-id 5Vf342EjVYrCjs8L5uwfDEoktbrVLeRPqFtYXDll9nDDFXUyCde25uCCgqRd3z1BMGXa2vZf38LjtMAzQS2of5JSl9W5pDVJcd6-6xPxzdI=@protonmail.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?  (Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holland@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
List pgsql-general
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Tuesday, October 26th, 2021 at 01:18, Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holland@gmail.com> wrote:

> In my opinion, ext4 will solve any and all problems without a very deep understanding of file system architecture. In
short,i would stick with ext4 unless you have a good reason not to. Maybe there is one. I have done this a long time
andnever thought twice about which file system should support my servers. 
>


Curious, when it comes to "traditional" filesystems, why ext4 and not xfs ? AFAIK the legacy issues associated with xfs
arelong gone ? 



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bob Jolliffe
Date:
Subject: Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
Next
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython3 package installation problem