Re: The two "XML Fixes" patches still in need of review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: The two "XML Fixes" patches still in need of review
Date
Msg-id 5C96DBB5.2080103@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The two "XML Fixes" patches still in need of review  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/23/19 18:20, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 03/23/19 17:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've now pushed a somewhat-adjusted version of the XML-content fix
>> patch.  The documentation patch needs some small rebasing to apply
>> after that one instead of before it.
> 
> Will do.
> 
>> Perhaps it'd make sense under the XML section in datatype.sgml,
>> but I think I might lean to making it a new section in Appendix D
>> (SQL Conformance).
> 
> Sounds like the option (4) I proposed back in [1]. I suppose it won't
> be much trouble to move.

PFA xml-functions-type-docfix-4.patch rebased, and with the limits/
compatibility section moved to Appendix D.

Regards,
-Chap

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL statement PREPARE does not work in ECPG
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take