Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date
Msg-id 5BFF713C.20600@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2018/11/28 23:31), Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:51:54AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:46:51AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> On 2018-Nov-28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:25:34PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>>>> Here is a small patch for removing $SUBJECT.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.  Patch applied through PG 10, where this first appeared.
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't Fujita-san push this patch himself?
>>
>> I was wondering that myself, but thought maybe he was busy and wanted
>> someone else to do it.
>
> Actually, it was so simple I thought he would just apply it, but he
> might have been following the protocol of posting the patch first, and
> in that case, I interfered by applying it.  Sorry.

No problem!  Thanks for taking care of this, Bruce!

(I also thought that was simple, but my first language is not English, 
so I thought it would be better to give others a chance for reviewing 
that.  Maybe my explanation in a previous email was not enough.  Sorry 
about that.)

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench: improve --help and --version parsing
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?