Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date
Msg-id 20181128143157.GE24817@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:51:54AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:46:51AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2018-Nov-28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:25:34PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > > Here is a small patch for removing $SUBJECT.
> > > 
> > > Agreed.  Patch applied through PG 10, where this first appeared.
> > 
> > Why wouldn't Fujita-san push this patch himself?
> 
> I was wondering that myself, but thought maybe he was busy and wanted
> someone else to do it.

Actually, it was so simple I thought he would just apply it, but he
might have been following the protocol of posting the patch first, and
in that case, I interfered by applying it.  Sorry.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Markdown format output for psql, design notes