(2018/10/01 19:42), Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 02:17:38PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> I used perform instead of execute since the later is usually
>> associated with local operation. I added "foreign" in the name of the
>> function to indicate that it's executed on foreign server. I am happy
>> with "remote" as well. I don't think "one" and "single" make any
>> difference. I don't like "parameterized" since that gets too tied to
>> the method we are using rather than what's actually being done. In
>> short I don't find any of the suggestions to be significantly better
>> or worse than the name I have chosen. Said that, I am not wedded to
>> any of those. A committer is free to choose anything s/he likes.
>
> Fujita-san, you are registered as a reviewer of this patch. Are you
> planning to look at it soon?
Yeah, I'm planning to work on this immediately after fixing the issue
[1], because it still seems to me wise to work on it after addressing
that issue. (I'll post an updated version of the patch for that tomorrow.)
> It looks useful to me to rework this code
> anyway to help with future maintenance,
Agreed.
> so in the worst case I could
> always look at it. For now I have moved it to the next commit fest.
Thanks for taking care of this!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
