unsubscribe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stevenson, Bob
Subject unsubscribe
Date
Msg-id 5B51B7761BF9B949A2EC5BB06EB6734507F07B7F@ITAM1EVS1.officemax.omx.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
unsubscribe

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Markus Schaber
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:34 AM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types

Hi, Tom,

Tom Lane wrote:

> One issue is what to do with procedural languages and large objects,
> which don't have any associated schema.  If we treat them as being
> outside all schemas, we'd have semantics like this: dump the PLs and
> blobs unless one or more --schema switches appeared.  Is that OK?

Sounds fine.

Is there a possibility to dump only those objects? Maybe --large-objects
and --languages?

Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
Next
From: Graham Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp subtraction (was Re: [SQL] formatting intervals