(2018/04/25 11:05), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>
>>> I think we should remove the words "if not already done" from that
>>> comment because 1) that function is called if the partition wasn't
>>> already initialized and 2) that function assumes that. Attached is a
>>> small patch for removing the words.
>>
>> Thanks, sounds fine. I think those words remain from earlier versions of
>> the patch committed as edd44738bc8 [1], where there used to be a fast-path
>> return if the ResultRelInfo was already non-NULL for the passed in index.
>
> Makes sense -- pushed, thanks both.
Thanks for committing, Alvaro! Thanks for reviewing, Amit!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
