Re: numeric regression test passes, but why? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
Date
Msg-id 5A575802.1060305@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/11/18 02:07, Tom Lane wrote:

> Hm, it won't help your sanity to know that those cases pass fine
> for me, interactively, on a couple of different machines:
> ...
> You sure you're using a stock build of Postgres?  No handmade
> versions of operator ^ lying around?

Interesting thought....

At $work:
postgresql95-server.x86_64               9.5.10-1PGDG.rhel7              @pgdg95

postgres=> select 0.5678 operator(pg_catalog.^) (-85);
ERROR:  division by zero
postgres=> select 0.5678::numeric operator(pg_catalog.^) (-85::numeric);
ERROR:  division by zero

Also at home in a gentoo 9.5.1 ebuild...
Also in a build from e35dba475a440f73dccf9ed1fd61e3abc6ee61db in git.

All x86_64 ....

-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY