Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Date
Msg-id 59e1ecbe-a13f-53e6-3781-75851b7e1812@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 2024-01-26 Fr 09:18, Dave Cramer wrote:


On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 07:36, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

On 2024-01-25 Th 20:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:52:30PM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:32, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>> On 2024-01-25 Th 16:17, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>> Yeah, I think the default Developer Command Prompt for VS2022 is set up
>>> for x86 builds. AIUI you should start by executing "vcvarsall x64_arm64".
>> Yup, now I'm in the same state you are
> Wait a minute here.  Based on [1], x64_arm64 means you can use a x64
> host and you'll be able to produce ARM64 builds, still these will not
> be able to run on the host where they were built.  How much of the
> patch posted upthread is required to produce such builds?  Basically
> everything from it, I guess, so as build dependencies can be
> satisfied?
>
> [1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/building-on-the-command-line?view=msvc-170


If you look at the table here x86 and x64 are the only supported host
architectures. But that's OK, the x64 binaries will run on arm64 (W11
ARM64 has x64 emulation builtin). If that didn't work Dave and I would
not have got as far as we have. But you want the x64_arm64 argument to
vcvarsall so you will get ARM64 output.

I've rebuilt it using  x64_arm64 and with the attached (very naive patch) and I still get an x64 binary :(


I am definitely getting ARM64 binaries (e.g. for initdb.exe the Windows on ARM compatibility setting is greyed out)


I'll try your patch.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Isaac Morland
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement?
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement?