Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Haron, Charles
Subject Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql
Date
Msg-id 593E515C9586D511BB4500010283D5E24396@COG-MAIL
Whole thread Raw
In response to Microsoft access verses postgresql  (Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net>)
List pgsql-admin
Not only will you have performance and corruption issues, you'll also have
problems with the lock file. And security is a pain to manage. We have
replaced all of our multi-user Access databases with PostgreSQL.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoffrey [mailto:esoteric@3times25.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> Subject: [ADMIN] Microsoft access verses postgresql
>
>
> I've got a client who is following my suggestion that they
> replace a set
> of excel spreadsheets with a database solution.  They are
> looking at two
> proposals, postgresql solution or an Access solution.  The
> requirements
> will include vpn connectivity from one site to another.  It
> appears they
> will be going with the Access solution.  I've got concerns regarding
> this based on research I've done that seems to indicate that Access,
> when used in a multi-user solution is easily corrupted.  Does anyone
> have any knowledge/experience with such issues?
>
> --
> Until later, Geoffrey    esoteric@3times25.net
>
> Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo@postgresql.org
>

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "David Green"
Date:
Subject: Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql
Next
From: somphong settawipattanachai
Date:
Subject: delete postmaster.pid on windows xp home edition before startup postmaster