On Sunday, July 24, 2016 7:05:46 PM CEST Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
>
> On 2016/07/24 18:28, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:19:42 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:09:18 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >>> Hi Hiroshi,
> >>>
> >>> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 12:19:01 PM CEST Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> >>>> On 2016/06/28 17:52, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:36:43 AM CEST Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> >>>>>> Did any platform succeed (e.g. Intel64)?
> >>>>> No. Looks like x86_64/i686 is in the best condition, we apply only one
> >>>>> downstream patch in Fedora (revert of the MONEY [1] fix which I believe should
> >>>>> be reverted upstream) and then the testsuite succeeds.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To build on armv7hl, we apply [2].
> >>>> Could you try the attached patch on armv7hl?
> >>> of course. Submitted build (for i686, x86_64 and armv7hl):
> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15001892
> >>> .. and all arches passed testsuite, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> There is just the remaining MONEY [1] revert patch.
> >> FYI:
> >>
> >> aarch64 passes too:
> >> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3639510
> >>
> >> s390 still fails:
> >> http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2297311
> > ppc64 fails, ppc64le (little endian) succeeds.
> > http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3549998
> >
> > Looks like remaining failure is big-endian related?
>
> Possibly the attached patch fixes the failure.
Right. Ater that the testsuite is OK on Fedora architectures where I'm able to
test (still need to revert MONEY fix [1]).
Can you please push the fixes into repository?
Thanks,
Pavel
