On 2016/07/24 18:28, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:19:42 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:09:18 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>> Hi Hiroshi,
>>>
>>> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 12:19:01 PM CEST Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
>>>> On 2016/06/28 17:52, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:36:43 AM CEST Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>>>>>> Did any platform succeed (e.g. Intel64)?
>>>>> No. Looks like x86_64/i686 is in the best condition, we apply only one
>>>>> downstream patch in Fedora (revert of the MONEY [1] fix which I believe should
>>>>> be reverted upstream) and then the testsuite succeeds.
>>>>>
>>>>> To build on armv7hl, we apply [2].
>>>> Could you try the attached patch on armv7hl?
>>> of course. Submitted build (for i686, x86_64 and armv7hl):
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15001892
>>> .. and all arches passed testsuite, thanks!
>>>
>>> There is just the remaining MONEY [1] revert patch.
>> FYI:
>>
>> aarch64 passes too:
>> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3639510
>>
>> s390 still fails:
>> http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2297311
> ppc64 fails, ppc64le (little endian) succeeds.
> http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3549998
>
> Looks like remaining failure is big-endian related?
Possibly the attached patch fixes the failure.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
