Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh berkus
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id 57362210.2010106@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 10.0  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 10.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/13/2016 08:19 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > Thoughts?  Is it crazy to go from 9.6beta1 to 10.0beta2?  What would
>> > actually be involved in making the change?
> Someone mentioned how Postgres 8.5 became 9.0, but then someone else
> said the change was made during alpha releases, not beta.  Can someone
> dig up the details?

/me digs through the announcement archives ...

We changed it to 9.0 for Alpha4.  By Beta1, it was already 9.0.

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0