Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id 13941.1463166034@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 05/13/2016 08:19 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Someone mentioned how Postgres 8.5 became 9.0, but then someone else
>> said the change was made during alpha releases, not beta.  Can someone
>> dig up the details?

> /me digs through the announcement archives ...
> We changed it to 9.0 for Alpha4.  By Beta1, it was already 9.0.

Yeah, I'd come to the same conclusion by checking the git history.
7.0 and 8.0 were also rebranded that way in advance of any beta
releases.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0
Next
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0