Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)
Date
Msg-id 57301df5-0e6e-1276-17e2-298f386b21a7@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 3/14/23 15:41, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 14:49, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ...
> 
>> If you agree with these changes, I'll get it committed.
> 
> Yes, thanks!
> 

I've tweaked the patch per the last round of comments, cleaned up the
commit message a bit (it still talked about unused bit in tuple header
and so on), and pushed it.

Thanks for fixing the issues that got the patch reverted last year!


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication