On 04/08/2016 02:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Jesper Pedersen
> <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 02:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> So recovery is conflicting here. My guess is that this patch is
>>> missing some lock cleanup.
>>>
>>> With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
>>> not even get replayed.
>>>
>>
>> Should we create an entry for the open item list [0] for this, due to the
>> replication lag [1] ?
>>
>> CommitFest entry [2]
>> Original commit [3]
>>
>> Cc'ed RMT.
>
> If there is something you think needs to be fixed that is a new issue
> in 9.6, then yes you should. I don't quite understand what thing is
> from reading this, so please make sure to describe it clearly.
>
Michael, you seem to have the necessary permission for this. Could you
add an entry ?
Best regards, Jesper
