On 04/08/2016 09:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> OK, at this stage it appears to me that if today is the deadline for
>> getting this in for 9.6 then it's going to be missed.
> It would be unfortunate to go another year without support for that
> toolchain. My suggestion is that you continue to work away on the
> problem, and when you have something that passes your testing, you
> present it to -hackers and we can decide then whether it's too invasive
> for a post-feature-freeze patch.
>
>
OK. Michael just told me in IM that he thinks he has a fix, so we'll see.
cheers
andrew
