Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki? - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?
Date
Msg-id 56F0B3EF.5040100@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?  (Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de>)
List pgsql-www
On 03/21/2016 06:57 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> When looking through the wiki, there are various mentions
> of pgFoundry around.  They're not really pointing out that
> it's extremely legacy/unwanted ;>, and to not put new projects
> on there.
>
> Should we remove the references to it, or make them explicity
> say something like "Do Not Use pgFoundry for new projects", or
> <other suggestions welcome>? :)

As far as I know, any active project has moved from pgFoundry. The best 
solution is to find where the new home is and update the links.

It is correct that .Org does not endorse PgFoundry due to reliability 
issues.


>
> + Justin
>
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: request for wiki editor privileges