Re: Speedup twophase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date
Msg-id 56E9EEAA.30903@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Speedup twophase transactions  (Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/26/16 3:39 PM, Stas Kelvich wrote:
> Agree, I had the same idea in my mind when was writing that script.
>
> I will migrate it to TAP suite and write a review for Michael Paquier's patch.
>
> Stas Kelvich
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
>
>> On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:20, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> Stas Kelvich wrote:
>>
>>> While this patch touches quite sensible part of postgres replay and there is some rarely used code paths, I wrote
shellscript to setup master/slave replication and test different failure scenarios that can happened with instances.
Attachingthis file to show test scenarios that I have tested and more importantly to show what I didn’t tested.
ParticularlyI failed to reproduce situation where StandbyTransactionIdIsPrepared() is called, may be somebody can
suggestway how to force it’s usage. Also I’m not too sure about necessity of calling cache invalidation callbacks
duringXlogRedoFinishPrepared(), I’ve marked this place in patch with 2REVIEWER comment.
 
>>
>> I think this is the third thread in which I say this: We need to push
>> Michael Paquier's recovery test framework, then convert your test script
>> to that.  That way we can put your tests in core.

It seems this thread has been waiting quite a while on a new patch.  If 
one doesn't appear by Monday I will mark this "returned with feedback".

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types