Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Artur Zakirov
Subject Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension
Date
Msg-id 56E6E676.8060206@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension
Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension
List pgsql-hackers
On 14.03.2016 18:48, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 2/25/16 5:00 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>> But, It doesn't sound like I am going to win that debate.  Given that,
>> I don't think we need a different name for the function. I'm fine with
>> explaining the word-boundary subtlety in the documentation, and
>> keeping the function name itself simple.
>
> It's not clear to me if you are requesting more documentation here or
> stating that you are happy with it as-is.  Care to elaborate?
>
> Other than that I think this patch looks to be ready for committer. Any
> objections?
>

There was some comments about the word-boundary subtlety. But I think it
was not enough.

I rephrased the explanation of word_similarity() and %>. It is better now.

But if it is not correct I can change the explanation.

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Integer overflow in timestamp[tz]_part() and date/time boundaries check
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct types and limits for PL/Perl SPI query results