El 26/02/16 a las 16:33, s d escribió:
> On 26 February 2016 at 20:19, Leonardo M. Ramé <l.rame@griensu.com
> <mailto:l.rame@griensu.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> El 26/02/16 a las 16:18, s d escribió:
>
>
> On 26 February 2016 at 20:02, Leonardo M. Ramé
> <l.rame@griensu.com <mailto:l.rame@griensu.com>
> <mailto:l.rame@griensu.com <mailto:l.rame@griensu.com>>> wrote:
>
>
> El 26/02/16 a las 15:55, John R Pierce escribió:
>
> On 2/26/2016 10:29 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
> Hi, I created a Postgres_FDW table (TABLE_A) and
> need to do
> an update on that table.
>
> As TABLE_A has a trigger, and the trigger does an
> insert on
> another table (TABLE_B), I had to create another
> foreign
> table called TABLE_B, that's ok.
>
>
>
> that trigger is defined on the server that actually has
> table_a,
> right? or did you define a trigger on the FDW table ?
>
> Hi John, yes, the trigger is only defined on the foreign
> server.
>
>
> Let's check we get this right!
> You have two "real" table in the remote server with a trigger
> doing it's
> job on them and on the local server you have and FDW on each remote
> table. Right?
>
>
> Yes, that's right.
>
>
> Then try to do the update on the remote db directly.
>
> In the meantime could you provide the table and trigger definitions?
>
I don't understand why the trigger is run in the caller database instead
of the called (foreign) one.
