On 2/8/16 10:02 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> I think it would make sense to implement the interface in at least
> one of our other supported PLs. I'm not entirely clear how well this
> will match up with, say, plperl, but I'd be interested to see.
>
>
> The minimalistic interface can be based on get/set functions. We can do
> necessary transformations there.
get/set functions where?
I don't think that really makes sense. I would expect schema variables
to be exposed to a function as variables or attributes, either in the
global namespace for that PL, or as an attribute of some object (ie the
plpy object in plpython).
I certainly wouldn't expect this patch to do that for all existing PLs,
but I think it's important to do it for one PL besides plpgsql to make
sure there's no gotchas.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
