Re: PostgreSQL Auditing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Auditing
Date
Msg-id 56B12AC6.4060709@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Auditing  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Auditing
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/2/16 4:50 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> We are looking into packaging pgaudit for Debian.
>
> However, then another question comes up: Should the 2nd Quadrant or the
> Crunchy Data codebase be added to the distribution? Who gets to decide?

For my 2 cents I think that the version I submitted recently is better
for PostgreSQL >= 9.5:

https://github.com/pgaudit/pgaudit

For this version I started with 2ndQuadrant's excellent work then spent
months refactoring, testing and adding additional configuration options.In addition a number of reviewers found issues
whichwere fixed and in 
general it went through a trial by fire.  This version includes more
comprehensive documentation and extensive regression tests.

However, the original 2ndQuadrant version will happily work with
PostgreSQL 9.3 or 9.4:

https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pgaudit

> Alternatively, both could be added, but that will likely confuse users.

This sort of confusion is one of the main reasons I pursued inclusion in
core.

--
-David
david@pgmasters.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.