Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3
Date
Msg-id 56876.1626531624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3  ("leiyanliang@highgo.com" <leiyanliang@highgo.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
"leiyanliang@highgo.com" <leiyanliang@highgo.com> writes:
> I want to know: this bug report is a problem or not ?

The code is operating as designed.  It does seem odd that there's no
mention of these variables in the documentation, though.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "leiyanliang@highgo.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17103: WAL segments are not removed after exceeding max_slot_wal_keep_size