On 2021-Jul-16, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > The buildfarm has remained green so far, but clearly this is something > we need to fix. Maybe it's as simple as adding the loop we use below, > starting at line 219. There are a few failures of this on buildfarm now, https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=flaviventris&dt=2021-07-16%2022%3A30%3A35 https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=desmoxytes&dt=2021-07-16%2021%3A52%3A04 https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dragonet&dt=2021-07-16%2021%3A52%3A05 I am running the test in a loop with the attached; if it doesn't fail in a few more rounds I'll push it. There are two instances of a different failure: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=kittiwake&dt=2021-07-17%2013%3A39%3A43 https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hornet&dt=2021-07-16%2021%3A14%3A14 # Failed test 'check that segments have been removed' # at t/019_replslot_limit.pl line 213. # got: '000000010000000000000021' # expected: '000000010000000000000022' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 19. [23:55:14] t/019_replslot_limit.pl .............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) I'm afraid about this not being something we can fix with some additional wait points ... -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La grandeza es una experiencia transitoria. Nunca es consistente. Depende en gran parte de la imaginación humana creadora de mitos" (Irulan)
pgsql-bugs by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных