Re: stats_block_level - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: stats_block_level
Date
Msg-id 5684.1185497025@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stats_block_level  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: stats_block_level  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So maybe the *real* question to ask is why we have separate GUCs for
>> stats_row_level and stats_block_level.  Shouldn't we fold them into a
>> single switch?  It's hard to see what having just one of them turned on
>> will save.

> Any reason not to just fold them both into stats_start_collector ?

Well, then you couldn't turn collection on and off without restarting
the postmaster, which might be a pain.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: default_text_search_config and expression indexes
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Quick idea for reducing VACUUM contention