Re: stats_block_level - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: stats_block_level
Date
Msg-id 46A914AB.5020001@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stats_block_level  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: stats_block_level
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> So maybe the *real* question to ask is why we have separate GUCs for
> stats_row_level and stats_block_level.  Shouldn't we fold them into a
> single switch?  It's hard to see what having just one of them turned on
> will save.

Any reason not to just fold them both into stats_start_collector ?

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: default_text_search_config and expression indexes